Free Materials For ESL Teachers and Learners

English Newsroom

Learn English through news articles - complete lesson plans, including articles, listening, classroom activities, quiz questions and more!

AI Tool Challenges Belief in Unique Fingerprints

Researchers at Columbia University have developed an AI tool that can identify whether fingerprints from different fingers belong to the same person with 75-90% accuracy, challenging the belief that each fingerprint is completely unique.
Try this article at a different level?

New research from Columbia University challenges the idea that every fingerprint is completely unique. The university's team used a special computer program to analyze 60,000 fingerprints and see if prints from different fingers belonged to the same person. The program was able to do this with about 75-90% accuracy, but the researchers aren't exactly sure how it worked. Instead of focusing on the little details of the ridges, like where they end or split, the program looked at the way the ridges were arranged in the middle of the finger. This is different from how forensic experts usually analyze fingerprints.

This study could have an impact on things like biometrics (using fingerprints to unlock phones, for example) and forensic science (solving crimes using fingerprints). Right now, if the police find a thumbprint at one crime scene and an index finger print at another, they can't say for sure if they're from the same person. But the computer program might be able to figure that out. The researchers say more research is needed before the program can be used in court, but it could be helpful for starting investigations.

Dr. Sarah Fieldhouse, who is an expert in forensic science, has some questions about the computer program. She wonders if the program's way of identifying fingerprints stays the same when the skin moves or changes over time. The researchers themselves aren't exactly sure how the program works, which is often the case with computer programs that use artificial intelligence.

The study from Columbia University has been reviewed by other experts and will be published in a scientific journal. But it's important to remember that these findings might not change much in real-life criminal investigations right now. Most people still believe that fingerprints are unique to each person.

Original news source: Our fingerprints may not be unique, claims AI (BBC)

🎧 Listen:

πŸ“– Vocabulary:

1. challenges
2. unique
3. analyze
4. accuracy
5. forensic
6. biometrics
7. thumbprint
8. index
9. investigations
10. artificial
11. identifying
12. reviewed
13. journal
14. findings
15. criminal

Group or Classroom Activities

Warm-up Activities:

– News Summary
Instructions: Have students read the article individually or in pairs. Then, ask them to write a summary of the article in their own words, including the main points and any relevant details. After they finish, have them share their summaries with a partner or the whole class.
– Opinion Poll
Instructions: Divide the class into small groups. Give each group a list of statements related to the article (e.g. "Fingerprints are completely unique to each person"). Have the groups discuss each statement and indicate whether they agree or disagree. After the discussion, ask each group to share their opinions and reasons with the rest of the class.
– Vocabulary Pictionary
Instructions: Prepare a list of vocabulary words from the article (e.g. biometrics, forensic science, artificial intelligence). Divide the class into pairs or small groups. Give each group a word and have them draw a picture to represent the word. The other groups must guess the word based on the drawing. Encourage the use of English during the guessing process.
– Pros and Cons
Instructions: Divide the class into two groups. Assign one group to come up with the pros of using fingerprints as a form of identification and the other group to come up with the cons. Give them a few minutes to brainstorm and then have each group share their ideas. Facilitate a class discussion to explore different perspectives on the topic.
– Future Predictions
Instructions: Ask students to imagine how fingerprint technology might evolve in the future. Have them write down their predictions individually or in pairs. Then, have them share their predictions with the class and discuss the potential impact on society, privacy, and security. Encourage creativity and critical thinking.

πŸ€” Comprehension Questions:

1. What did the researchers at Columbia University use to analyze the fingerprints?

2. How accurate was the computer program in determining if prints from different fingers belonged to the same person?

3. How did the program analyze the fingerprints differently from forensic experts?

4. What are some areas where this research could have an impact?

5. Why can't the police currently determine if fingerprints from different crime scenes are from the same person?

6. What questions does Dr. Sarah Fieldhouse have about the computer program?

7. Why are the researchers unsure about how the program works?

8. What do most people still believe about fingerprints?

🎧✍️ Listen and Fill in the Gaps:

New research from Columbia challenges the idea that every fingerprint is completely unique. The university's team used a special to analyze 60,000 fingerprints and see if prints from different belonged to the same person. The program was able to do this with about 75-90% accuracy, but the researchers aren't exactly sure how it worked. Instead of focusing on the little details of the ridges, like where they end or split, the program looked at the way the ridges were arranged in the middle of the finger. This is different from how experts usually analyze fingerprints. This could have an impact on things like biometrics (using fingerprints to unlock , for example) and forensic science (solving crimes using fingerprints). Right now, if the police find a thumbprint at one crime scene and an finger print at another, they can't say for sure if they're from the same person. But the computer program might be able to that out. The researchers say more research is needed before the program can be used in court, but it could be helpful for investigations. Dr. Sarah Fieldhouse, who is an expert in forensic science, has some questions about the computer program. She wonders if the program's way of identifying fingerprints stays the same when the skin or over time. The researchers themselves aren't exactly sure how the program , which is often the case with computer programs that use intelligence. The study from Columbia University has been reviewed by other and will be published in a scientific . But it's important to remember that these findings might not change much in real-life criminal investigations right now. Most people still believe that fingerprints are unique to each person.

πŸ’¬ Discussion Questions:

1. What is biometrics and how is it used in everyday life?
2. How would you feel if your phone could only be unlocked using your fingerprint?
3. Do you think it's important for fingerprints to be completely unique? Why or why not?
4. Have you ever seen a crime show or movie where fingerprints were used to solve a case? What did you think about it?
5. What do you think about using fingerprints as a form of identification? Do you think it's reliable?
6. How do you think this new research could impact forensic science in the future?
7. Do you think it's a good idea to use a computer program to analyze fingerprints in criminal investigations? Why or why not?
8. Have you ever had your fingerprints taken before? If so, why?
9. What do you think about the idea that fingerprints might not be completely unique?
10. How do you think this new research could change the way crimes are solved in the future?
11. Do you think it's important for scientists to fully understand how a computer program works before using it in court? Why or why not?
12. Have you ever heard of artificial intelligence before? What do you know about it?
13. How do you think this new research could impact the field of biometrics?
14. Do you think it's necessary for the researchers to conduct more studies before using the computer program in court? Why or why not?
15. What are some other ways that fingerprints could be used in everyday life, besides unlocking phones or solving crimes?

Individual Activities

πŸ“–πŸ’­ Vocabulary Meanings:

Click a dot next to a word, then click the dot next to its meaning to draw a line connecting them.

Words

1. challenges
2. unique
3. analyze
4. accuracy
5. forensic
6. biometrics
7. thumbprint
8. index
9. investigations
10. artificial
11. identifying
12. reviewed
13. journal
14. findings
15. criminal

Meanings

(A) The use of body measurements and calculations for identification purposes
(B) A type of magazine that publishes academic or professional research
(C) How correct or precise something is
(D) Made or produced by human beings rather than occurring naturally, especially as a copy of something natural
(E) Examined carefully and critically, especially before being accepted or approved
(F) The results or conclusions that come from examining or studying something
(G) Detailed searches or examinations to find out more about something
(H) Recognizing and naming someone or something
(I) Related to scientific methods of solving crimes, involving examining the objects or substances that are involved in the crime
(J) The pattern made by the tip of your thumb when it touches a surface
(K) To examine something carefully to understand it or learn more about it
(L) Referring to the finger next to the thumb
(M) To question or test the truth of something
(N) Being the only one of its kind; unlike anything else
(O) Related to the act of breaking the law

πŸ”‘ Multiple Choice Questions:

1. What did the researchers at Columbia University use to analyze fingerprints?
(a) Traditional forensic methods
(b) Microscopes
(c) DNA testing
(d) A special computer program
2. How accurate was the computer program in determining if fingerprints belonged to the same person?
(a) 75-90%
(b) 50-75%
(c) 90-100%
(d) Less than 50%
3. What aspect of the fingerprints did the computer program focus on?
(a) The end or split of the ridges
(b) The size of the ridges
(c) The arrangement of ridges in the middle of the finger
(d) The color of the ridges
4. How could this research impact biometrics?
(a) It could improve facial recognition technology
(b) It could make voice recognition more accurate
(c) It could enhance iris scanning technology
(d) It could affect the use of fingerprints to unlock phones
5. What is one potential application of this research in forensic science?
(a) Solving crimes using fingerprints
(b) Analyzing DNA evidence
(c) Examining blood spatter patterns
(d) Identifying suspects through eyewitness testimony
6. What is one concern raised by Dr. Sarah Fieldhouse about the computer program?
(a) Whether it can analyze other types of evidence
(b) Whether it can accurately identify fingerprints when the skin moves or changes
(c) Whether it is compatible with existing forensic methods
(d) Whether it can be used in court as evidence
7. How do the researchers at Columbia University feel about the workings of the computer program?
(a) They are confident in its accuracy
(b) They believe it is flawed
(c) They are unsure of how it works
(d) They think it needs further development
8. What is the general belief about fingerprints among most people?
(a) They are not reliable evidence in criminal investigations
(b) They are unique to each person
(c) They can be easily manipulated
(d) They are only useful for identifying individuals, not linking crimes

πŸ•΅οΈ True or False Questions:

A regular computer program was used to analyze 60,000 fingerprints and determine if prints from different fingers belonged to the same person.
The computer program might be able to solve this issue and determine if fingerprints are from the same person.
The program had an accuracy rate of 0-25%, and the researchers are unsure of how it actually worked.
Researchers at Columbia University have found that not every fingerprint is completely unique.
This conventional approach to analyzing fingerprints could have no impact on biometrics and forensic science.
Instead of focusing on the small details of the ridges, the program looked at the arrangement of the ridges in the middle of the finger.
However, no research is needed before the program can be used in court, and it could not be helpful for starting investigations.
Currently, if the police find fingerprints from different fingers at different crime scenes, they cannot determine if they are from the same person.

πŸ“ Write a Summary:

Write a summary of this news article in two sentences.
Check your writing now with the best free AI for English writing!

Writing Questions:

1. What did the researchers at Columbia University use to analyze fingerprints?
2. How accurate was the computer program in determining if prints from different fingers belonged to the same person?
3. How did the program analyze the fingerprints differently from forensic experts?
4. What are some potential areas where this research could have an impact?
5. Why do the researchers believe more research is needed before the program can be used in court?

How about these other Level 3 articles?

Red Wine Headaches: Quercetin Compound May Be Culprit

Researchers may have discovered why some people experience headaches after drinking red wine, suggesting that a compound called quercetin found in red grapes may interfere with how the body metabolizes alcohol.

Online
Class
Writing
Coach
β˜• 컀피 3μž” &
무료 ν”Όλ“œλ°±! πŸŽ“
β˜• 컀피 3μž” & 무료 ν”Όλ“œλ°±! πŸŽ“

X

[100% 온라인] λž­μ»€μŠ€ν„° λŒ€ν•™κ΅ μ˜μ–΄ 연ꡬ μ°Έμ—¬μž λͺ¨μ§‘
λ³„λ„μ˜ μ°Έκ°€λΉ„ 없이 영ꡭ λŒ€ν•™ 연ꡬ에 도움도 μ£Όμ‹œκ³ , 무료 μ˜μ–΄ μ‹€μ „ μ—°μŠ΅κ³Ό ν”Όλ“œλ°±λ„ λ°›μ•„λ³΄μ„Έμš”!

영ꡭ λž­μ»€μŠ€ν„° λŒ€ν•™κ΅(Lancaster University)μ—μ„œ ν•œκ΅­μΈ μ˜μ–΄ ν•™μŠ΅μžλΆ„λ“€μ„ λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ 연ꡬ ν”„λ‘œμ νŠΈλ₯Ό μ§„ν–‰ν•©λ‹ˆλ‹€. μ „ κ³Όμ • 온라인으둜 μ§„ν–‰λ˜μ–΄ μ–΄λ””μ„œλ“  νŽΈν•˜κ²Œ μ°Έμ—¬ν•˜μ‹€ 수 μžˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. μ—¬λŸ¬λΆ„μ˜ μ†Œμ€‘ν•œ μ°Έμ—¬λ‘œ ν•œκ΅­μΈμ˜ μ˜μ–΄ μ‚¬μš© 방식을 μ•Œμ•„λ³΄λŠ” ν₯미둜운 연ꡬ가 μ™„μ„±λ©λ‹ˆλ‹€.

🎁 μ°Έμ—¬ ν˜œνƒ:
– 원어민 μ—°κ΅¬μ›κ³Όμ˜ 1:1 νšŒν™” μ—°μŠ΅
– μ‹€μ „ μ˜μž‘ μ—°μŠ΅ & λ§žμΆ€ν˜• μ˜μ–΄ ν”Όλ“œλ°± 리포트
– 컀피 κΈ°ν”„ν‹°μ½˜ 총 3μž” μ„ λ¬Ό! (첫 μ„Έμ…˜ ν›„ 1μž”, λ§ˆμ§€λ§‰ μ„Έμ…˜ μ™„λ£Œ ν›„ 2μž” 더 λ“œλ €μš”! β˜•β˜•)

πŸ“… μ°Έμ—¬ 방식: 총 2회의 온라인 μ„Έμ…˜ (Zoom 등을 이용, 각 μ„Έμ…˜λ‹Ή μ•½ 60~80λΆ„ μ†Œμš”) λ§ν•˜κΈ°μ™€ μ“°κΈ° ν™œλ™μ΄ μ„žμ—¬ μžˆμ–΄ λΆ€λ‹΄ 없이 즐겁게 μ°Έμ—¬ν•˜μ‹€ 수 μžˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€.

βœ… λŒ€μƒ: μ˜μ–΄ μ‹€λ ₯에 상관없이 μ°Έμ—¬λ₯Ό ν¬λ§ν•˜λŠ” 18μ„Έ 이상 ν•œκ΅­μΈ λˆ„κ΅¬λ‚˜

Feedback