A video in Nikon's Small World contest is getting a lot of attention. Scientists believe that the video might have been changed with special computer tools. These tools should not change the real video parts. The video shows tiny hairs, called cilia, moving in the airways of a sick child.
Dr. Ning Xu made the video and says no rules were broken. He explained that the computer tools only helped make details clearer, but did not make the video. Some judges and scientists, however, think the video looks strange and may have odd parts.
Nikon is checking the claims carefully by investigating the video. They want to make sure everything in the contest is fair and open. Once they find out the truth, they will share what they discovered. This ensures everyone trusts the contest results.
Original news source: Tiny image sparks big backlash in Nikon photo contest – BBC News (BBC)
🎧 Listen:
📖 Vocabulary:
Group or Classroom Activities
Warm-up Activities:
1. Discuss what you know about AI in technology.
2. Share a time when you saw a cool video or picture.
3. Talk about a competition you participated in.
4. What do you think is the role of judges in contests?
5. How important do you think it is to have clear rules in competitions?
🤔 Comprehension Questions:
A video is causing concerns because it might have been modified.
They believe the video might have been changed with special computer tools.
The video shows cilia moving in the airways of a sick child.
Dr. Ning Xu made the video and insists no rules were broken.
He said they helped make details clearer, but did not make the video.
They claim the video has strange features.
Nikon is investigating the claims to make sure the contest is fair.
🎧✍️ Listen and Fill in the Gaps:
A video in Nikon's Small contest is getting a lot of attention. Scientists that the video might have been changed with computer tools. These tools should not change the real video parts. The video shows hairs, called cilia, moving in the airways of a sick child. Dr. Ning Xu made the video and no rules were broken. He explained that the tools helped make details clearer, but did not make the video. Some and scientists, however, think the video looks and may have odd parts. Nikon is checking the claims carefully by investigating the video. They want to sure everything in the contest is and . Once they find out the truth, they will share what they discovered. This ensures everyone trusts the contest results.
💬 Discussion Questions:
1. Do you think AI should be allowed in video competitions?
2. What could be some benefits of using AI in making videos?
3. How would you feel if you lost a contest due to tech errors?
4. Why do you think rules are essential in competitions?
5. Have you ever entered a contest? What was it like?
6. How do you feel about judges deciding winners in contests?
7. Do you think it's fair to use technology to enhance videos?
8. What is more important: creativity or rules?
9. How would you handle being accused of cheating in a contest?
10. What do you think makes a video stand out?
11. How can contests ensure that entries are judged fairly?
12. Do you trust technology more or less than people when deciding fairness?
Individual Activities
📖💭 Vocabulary Meanings:
Click a dot next to a word, then click the dot next to its meaning to draw a line connecting them.
